Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Nosy Rodents?

Nearly everybody is guilty of eavesdropping once in a while; it often comes naturally to listen in on the conversations of people around you- especially if the subject matter is something that affects you. According to Joseph Felts and Kenneth A. Schmidt, other animals also pick up on signals that are not meant for them to hear. In the paper "Multitasking and eavesdropping in cotton rats foraging under predation risk," Felts and Schmidt describe the way that cotton rats use signals from other animals to determine when predators are nearby.

Red-tailed hawks are a common predator of cotton rats. They also hunt small birds living in the area including blue jays and robins. Felts and Schmidt predicted that cotton rats would use signals from these birds to determine whether there was danger of a hawk attack. They tested the response of cotton rats to the alarm call of the blue jay, the nonalarm vocalization of the blue jay, Robin song and the call of the red-tailed hawk itself. To test the rats' perception of danger, they used the concept of giving up densities (GUDs). Cotton rats (and other foraging animals) maximize their energy intake by balancing the amount of time they spend foraging in an area with the costs and risks of foraging. When food becomes scarce enough that the energy gained from foraging is equal to the costs and risks associated with foraging, the behavior stops. GUDs were measured by providing the rats with seeds mixed in sand and measuring the amount of seed that was left by the rats. Felts and Schmidt predicted that the GUDs of cotton rats would increase when they heard the alarm call of the blue jay or the call of the hawk itself and that GUDs would decrease when they heard the nonalarm song of the blue jay or the robin song because these songs indicate that there are no predators present.

Felts and Schmidt found that while cotton rats did not respond change their behavior(significantly) in response to the nonalarm calls of the blue jays or robins or the call of the red-tailed hawk, they did respond to the alarm call of the blue jay. When they heard the blue-jay alarm call, the GUDs of cotton rats increased and they spent less time foraging. I thought it was really interesting that animals not only develop signals to communicate with each other, but can also evolve to respond to other signals that benefit them.

5 comments:

  1. Wow that's really neat! It makes a lot of sense that animals would evolve the ability to respond to the alarm calls of other species. It undoubtedly benefits them. I wonder if the rats only respond to a few species' alarm calls, or if they are tuned to many others' as well. Maybe different populations respond to different species' alarm calls? Who knows.

    -Alex Sprague

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good point Alex. The lack of response to the red-tailed hawk makes me wonder if the rats are only responsive to predators that are native to their region? I also wonder if this is a learned trait or a trait passed on genetically.

    -Kevin Tse

    ReplyDelete
  3. That would be interesting to see whether this ability is genetic or learned. It could possibly be a combination of both? I am also curious as to whether this system works both ways. If blue jays perceive that the rats have suddenly stopped foraging, then will they assume a predator is nearby? Then, the hawks would really have to work for food!

    -Katie Kalutkiewicz

    ReplyDelete
  4. The article mentions that the cotton rats responded to the alarm calls of the blue jays but doesn't mention the robins. Did they not respond? And I wonder what other kind of relationships between species do this as well, in the sense that's not between birds species, but different classes.

    Posted by Vince Tieu

    ReplyDelete
  5. Do you know if different species of rodents have evolved to have this trait or is it solely something that is documented across certain species? Its seems likely that this is very common behavior.

    Ahmed Sandakli

    ReplyDelete